The trial court itself was hesitant and appeared not completely convinced of its own verdict. The Court is aware of the facility with which a defense of alibi can be concocted and fabricated, although there are cases in which it maybe sic entertained when it is predicated upon substantial and reliable evidence which can engender in the mind of the Court reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the accused. Secondly, the trial court ignored or overlooked substantial facts and circumstances which would have affected the result of the case. The Oscar nominee reflects on his memorable appearance on ” Game of Thrones ,” and teases his Star Wars role. In relation to the position where you fell, how far was Reynaldo Baldemora from you? Oargas testimony supported Jimmys alibi. Edit Storyline The true story of a law enforcer who did everything he could to uphold the law. We hold however that it is not the weakness of alibi that shall warrant conviction, but rather the prosecutions quantum of evidence proving commission of the offense beyond reasonable doubt.
What further supports his acquittal is the same reasoning the trial court used in convicting him. The assailed Decision in consolidated Criminal Cases Nos. And since they couldn’t seek vindication from him, they went after his family instead. Oarga was transferred to Clark Airbase in Pampanga. The driver tried to stop the car but it did so only around a hundred meters away from the boundary of the two towns. In criminal law, the quantum of evidence for conviction of an accused is that which produces moral certainty in an unprejudiced mind that the accused is guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Oarga, in July , when he learned of the troubles in Lumban involving the Manambit family, he advised Jimmy to stay with his wife who was then residing at Nichols Air Base.
The trial court itself was hesitant and appeared not completely convinced of its own verdict.
People vs Manambit : : April 18, : J Panganiban : Third Division
Before wheeling him into the operating room, the doctors found that Reynaldos blood pressure of over 60 at 2: Several photographs were taken of the premises and the objects found there.
Worse, it placed on the accused the burden of showing their innocence; rather than on the prosecution, that amdres proving their guilt.
His driver was hit at the back by either a bullet or a shrapnel. As the four men stood up with firearms raised, Hector veered the motorcycle to the center manamblt the road to Lumban because the red car was about to overtake him.
Evidence to be believed must not only proceed from the mouth of a credible witness but it must also be credible in itself, such that common experience and observation of mankind lead to the inference of its probability under the circumstances. Effect of the change of judges during trial, and 5. Hector saw Tony looking out from the window and making hand signals to Ramon Mamuri who was in the bahay pulungan nearby. Effect of the change of judges during trial, sotry. When I saw Choy Rana making a signal I look sic at the place where kovie was then making the signal and saw four 4 armed anrres who stood up.
Ramos dropping by first at the house of Ate Minda to make a telephone call.
Andres Manambit: Angkan ng matatapang () – Full Cast & Crew – IMDb
Did you come to know who were sina maambit by Rey Baldemora? Reynaldo crawled to the right, some five 5 meters away from Hector. We shall elaborate on these in the following pages. The wicked fleeth, but the innocent is as brave as the lion. Motive of the Accused and the Insufficiency. Continuing with his testimony, Samonte declared that he veered his motorcycle to the center of the highway, but the red car carrying Gabatan and driven by Abel Abarquez squeezed through, and that was the time he heard shots and felt that he Samonte was hit.
This reason for conviction is stort untenable by the admission of the trial court that the participation of Mamuri was not sufficiently disclosed.
Asuncion now Associate Justice of the Court of Appeals. The trial court then considered the findings of Dr. The liability of Llames as an accomplice is also a big question to this Court.
Clores, SCRA In a nutshell, the version of the accused Mauricio Llames betrays a guilty conscience. The Court, however, is unable to sustain Appellant Jimmys manambt that the trial court erred in giving credence to the alibi of the other accused while rejecting that of the appellant.
With respect to Llames, he was found guilty as stoty accomplice for the following reasons: You mentioned that you started driving the motorcycle slowly towards Lumban. The trial court convicted him because his defense of alibi was weak. Did you hear any answer from Baldemora insofar as that question of Baldemeca is concerned? Ramos returned with the news that Hector Samonte had been one of the victims in the shooting incident.
The prosecution, with due regard to the existing acrimony between the Samontes and Manambits, cannot discount the likelihood that Hector might have been prompted to accuse the Manambit brothers as the ones responsible.
I also asked him whether he recognized others and he told sic or answered that he was not able to recognize the others. Sandiganbayan, SCRA After a judicious evaluation of the evidence in these cases, the Court cannot assert with tsory certainty that Appellant Jimmy is guilty of the crimes charged.
Andres Manambit Story
He took a jeepney bearing Atty. For, taken in the light of all the evidence on record, it may be sufficient to acquit him x x x x x x People vs. Was that the only question asked of you by Rustico Liwanag? A I told him that it was Choy Rana who first made the signal to the four armed me sic with long firearms.
Baldemeca, who was cuddling the head of Reynaldo, asked the latter in Tagalog who had shot him. After the promulgation of the Decision, the trial court issued an order directing the clerk of court to forward to this Court the original records and voluminous transcripts of stenographic notes of the consolidated cases in view of the imposition of the death penalty upon Jimmy Manambit.
These obvious hesitations and directly conflicting grounds for conviction cannot escape our attention. Upon reaching the place, Zenon found that his brother was no longer around.